Free decision tool
Do you need a penetration test or a vulnerability assessment?
They sound similar and get confused constantly, but they answer different questions, and the right choice depends on where you are today. Answer eight quick questions for a clear recommendation. Nothing is sent anywhere; it's scored right here in your browser.
Decision questions
Our recommendation
Start with a Vulnerability Assessment
A vulnerability assessment is a broad, systematic review of your systems that finds and ranks known weaknesses (missing patches, misconfigurations, exposed services) and hands you a prioritized list of what to fix.
Your answers point to gaps in the fundamentals. A penetration test right now would mostly rediscover issues a scan surfaces faster and far more cheaply. Get the full picture first, fix what matters, and a future pen test will deliver much more value.
Your answers were close between the two. When it’s that close, the assessment is the sensible first step: it costs less, covers more ground, and tells you exactly where a future penetration test should focus, so neither engagement is wasted.
You're ready for a Penetration Test
A penetration test is a human-led, goal-oriented attack simulation. Instead of just listing weaknesses, a tester chains them together the way a real attacker would, to show whether someone could actually break in, how far they'd get, and what would be exposed along the way.
You already have the fundamentals in place, or you need to validate your defences against a specific target or requirement. That's exactly when a penetration test earns its keep: it tests reality, not theory.
Note: because a requirement specifically calls for a penetration test, this is the engagement you'll need to satisfy it.
Both, in the right order
These two services answer different questions. A vulnerability assessment asks “what weaknesses do we have?” A penetration test asks “can an attacker actually exploit them, and how far would they get?”
Your answers point to value in both, and the most cost-effective path is to sequence them: run a vulnerability assessment first to find and fix the obvious issues, then a penetration test to validate your defences against a real-world attacker. That way the test spends its time on genuine attack paths, not the low-hanging fruit a scan would have caught.
If budget forces a choice, start with the vulnerability assessment and add the penetration test once the fixes from it have landed.
Note: a requirement specifically calls for a penetration test, so you'll still need the pen test itself. Running the assessment first simply means it finds real risk instead of basic hygiene gaps.
Vulnerability Assessment
Breadth · recurring
Scans many systems to find and rank known weaknesses. Answers “what's wrong?” Best run on a regular schedule.
Penetration Test
Depth · point-in-time
A human tester simulates a real attacker, chaining weaknesses toward a goal. Answers “can someone actually get in, and how far?”
Want help deciding scope, timing, and what's right for your environment? Get in touch. No obligation.